Consider a home cooling system, for example. Most thermostats use a “bang-bang” control algorithm that compares the actual room te
www.cechina.cn, a time-proportional controller can emulate the effects of a continuous actuator. In teh top examplewww.cechina.cn," src="http://www.cechina.cn/upload/article/319ecdf9-4bd4-438d-a600-1db482ae9e67/1.gif">
By cycling a discrete actuator on and offwww.cechina.cn, a time-proportional controller can emulate the effects of a continuous actuator. In teh top examplewww.cechina.cn, the controller is attempting to achieve a 50% control effort by keeping the actuator in the "on" position 50% of the time. In the bottom examplewww.cechina.cn, the controller is trying to achieve a 75% control effort by turning the actuator on for 3 duty cycles then off for 1.
The thermostat could achieve tighter control with a continuous actuator such as a motorized damper that would continuously allow a measured amount of chilled air into the room. Those are common in commercial HVAC applications but are typically too expensive for home use.
But with time-proportional control, a home thermostat wouldn’t need a continuous actuator to emulate its effects. It could use the air conditioner’s on/off switch to regulate not the amount of cool air being dumped into the room but the duration of each blast. To achieve an X% control effort, the thermostat would simply turn the air conditioner on for X units of time then off for 100 minus X units of time.
If those units are small compared to the time it takes to cool the room (a few minutes or so)