Consider a home cooling system, for example. Most thermostats use a “bang-bang” control algorithm that compares the actual room te
www.cechina.cn, a time-proportional controller can emulate the effects of a continuous actuator. In teh top example," src="http://www.cechina.cn/upload/article/319ecdf9-4bd4-438d-a600-1db482ae9e67/1.gif">
By cycling a discrete actuator on and offwww.cechina.cn, a time-proportional controller can emulate the effects of a continuous actuator. In teh top example, the controller is attempting to achieve a 50% control effort by keeping the actuator in the "on" position 50% of the time. In the bottom example, the controller is trying to achieve a 75% control effort by turning the actuator on for 3 duty cycles then off for 1.
The thermostat could achieve tighter control with a continuous actuator such as a motorized damper that would continuously allow a measured amount of chilled air into the room. Those are common in commercial HVAC applications but are typically too expensive for home use.
But with time-proportional control, a home thermostat wouldn’t need a continuous actuator to emulate its effects. It could use the air conditioner’s on/off switch to regulate not the amount of cool air being dumped into the room but the duration of each blast. To achieve an X% control effort, the thermostat would simply turn the air conditioner on for X units of time then off for 100 minus X units of time.
If those units are small compared to the time it takes to cool the room (a few minutes or so)


在线会议
论坛
专题
工控直播
新闻中心
子站
技术
社区


2026具身智能机器人电子制造应用研讨会
福禄克六大“法宝”帮您搞定过程仪表校准难题
中控时间序列大模型TPT免费有奖体验
爱德克SE2L进阶版安全激光扫描仪有奖预约演示
剑维软件电子半导体行业白皮书有奖下载





















