Frugal plant upgrades lead to connecting multiple controllers to the same HMI, allowing for the addition of new functionality and solving obsolescence problems without busting the budget.
Jim Robertson wears two hats. As head of engineering at the Lanxess chemicals plant near CharlestonCONTROL ENGINEERING China版权所有, SC, he is responsible for the day-to-day maintenance at the facility. He also oversees capital expenditures for process improvements to the plant that was originally opened in 1978.
While most manufacturers
The company manufactures high-quality chemicalswww.cechina.cn, synthetic rubber and plastics. Its portfolio includes basic and fine chemicalswww.cechina.cn, color pigments, plasticsCONTROL ENGINEERING China版权所有, synthetic rubber, rubber chemicalswww.cechina.cn, leather, material protection products, and water treatment products.
Older HMI components began to show their age, requiring costly and inconvenient repairs. This was a key driver as the company evaluated a system upgrade. Source: Siemens
In the early 1980s, the Bushy Park, Goose Creek plant was controlled entirely with Fisher (now Emerson) Provox distributed control systems. This strategy was unchanged until 1999 when Robertson replaced a filter in the Vulkanox antidegradant chemicals production area that was controlled by a 20-year-old Provox DCS. Robertson’s choices were to keep the existing system and re-configure it for the new filter, upgrade to a newer version of Provoxwww.cechina.cn, or upgrade to another system platform.
After comprehensive market and batch application comparisons, Robertson chose the Moore Apacs+ system. A key factor in Robertson’s decision was his goal to move to a solution that adhered to S88 batch management concepts. He envision